FDA favors Chantix over e-cigarettes. Why?

September 14th, 2009 by Kurt Niland

electronic smoke 2Chantix made an appearance in last week’s issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) when one contributor wrote that the Food and Drug Administration has acknowledged receiving nearly 100 reports of and nearly 200 reports of attempted likely linked to the use of Chantix. Additionally, the also said it is compliling reports of Chantix patients being involved in traffic accidents. The JAMA article prompted doctor and authority on smoking, Michael Siegel, to question why the allows to remain on the market, especially in light of the agency’s threats to remove all electronic cigarettes from the market. Dr. Siegel, who is also an associate chairman and professor at Boston University School of Public Health, authors a blog about all issues pertaining to smoking and tobacco and isn’t afraid to call out a double standard when he sees one.

“If has been studied and has been found to have likely caused 98 deaths and an additional 188 attempted suicides and it is allowed to remain on the market because smoking cessation is such an important goal, then what is the point of removing e-cigarettes from the market while studying its potential adverse effects?” Dr. Siegel asked in his blog.

“Suppose e-cigarettes were to be found to have caused 100 deaths. Would that warrant taking it off the market, since it — like — is helping people to quit smoking?” he asked further.

“… unlike – for which there were many immediate post-marketing reports of potential adverse effects, e-cigarettes have been on the market for more than 3 years and there have yet to be any severe adverse effects reported,” Dr. Siegel said.

“In other words, we know that people are dying from taking but we’re going to allow it to remain on the market because it’s helping people to quit smoking. We know that there is no evidence that anyone is dying from using electronic cigarettes, but we’re going to take them off the market, even though they are helping people to quit smoking. That just doesn’t make any sense,” Dr. Siegel said.

Dr. Siegel also blames the pharmaceutical industry’s massive power to influence opinion, whether it’s a position taken by a consumer group, an erroneous statement made by a nonprofit organization, or the public opinion in general.

He notes that some anti-smoking groups are calling on the to withdraw e-cigarettes from the market despite a lack of evidence suggesting they are harmful, yet the same groups do not advocate for the removal of , even though the drug tops the ’s list of most dangerous drugs.

“So far, every anti-smoking group which has called for the removal of e-cigarettes from the market has been found to be financially tied to Big Pharma. The Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, and Action on Smoking and Health have all received funding of some sort from the pharmaceutical industry,” Dr. Siegel said.

  • deslock
    The story of the electronic cigarette has revealed that the very institutions that are supposed to protect people in the U.S. are really out to exploit us for the sake of drug giants flawed products and for big tobacco itself. So far Chantix has made 300 people try and kill themselves. 100 succeeded. So far electronic cigarettes have killed no one, and believe me, anti-smoking zealots and big pharma would love to have a death happen to point at. Sadly, so would many state and federal officials. They are scared that they may not get away with overtaxing e-cigs they way they have regular, toxic tobacco products. However, even if ecigs are made illegal and hard to get, the cat is out of the bag. Making marijuana illegal has not stopped the sale of paraphernalia.

    In fact if the government were to make all tobacco and related products illegal, quality would probably improve.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.