Regular “light” cigarette brands contain 20 times the amount of nicotine as VLN cigarettes, a release by the manufacturer states. Even low nicotine cigarettes contain about 8 times more nicotine than a VLN cigarette.

Studies have shown that “Differences in nicotine content of cigarettes have significant implications for compensatory smoking, dependence, and efficacy in smoking cessation,” according to the manufacturer.

Research conducted so far indicates that VLN cigarettes may prove to be one of the most effective smoking cessation inventions yet. Although VLN cigarettes have yet to be tested in large clinical trials, they have been tested in a number of smaller, independent studies. In each of the studies, VLN cigarettes increased quit rates, whether they were used exclusively or in combination with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), such as nicotine gum, lozenges, and patches.

A University of Minnesota trial suggested that using VLN cigarettes alone boosted smoking cessation success rates more than NRT.

43 percent of patients who used VLN cigarettes exclusively continued to be smoke-free after 4 weeks of continuous abstinence. The success rate for patients using NRT was just 28 percent.

A pair of studies conducted at Duke University, which set out to measure and compare the strength of nicotine cravings with the actual smoking habit, supported these findings.

The Duke studies found that the urge to light a cigarette is sometimes “more compelling than the physical need for a nicotine fix.”

In light of that finding, it’s no surprise that researchers found VLN cigarettes more effective in helping smokers to quit than NRT. VLN cigarettes gradually wean the body from nicotine as the user smokes. With NRT, the smoker stops smoking altogether but continues to feed the body nicotine, usually to “take the edge off” of smoking cravings. Very commonly, however, ex-smokers end up addicted to various forms of NRT even though they have successfully quit smoking.

Another smoking cessation approach, of course, is to use pharmaceutical therapies such as Chantix or Zyban (also known as Wellbutrin). One problem, however, is that these drugs don’t adequately address the habitual side of smoking. They may mitigate the effects of nicotine withdrawal, but after the quit date, the patient is left to cope with the sudden absence of a psychological “crutch.”

More importantly, however, is the safety factor. Because they already smoke, people who use VLN cigarettes do not introduce any new chemicals or other compounds to their bodies, thereby exposing themselves to a range of dangerous and occasionally deadly side effects.

Chantix has been linked to several side effects ranging from mild to severe and including:

• difficulty breathing
• swelling of the face, lips, tongue, or throat
• fever
• sore throat
• headache
• blistering, peeling skin rash
• nausea, vomiting
• stomach pain
• indigestion
• weakness
• fatigue
• increased appetite
• unpleasant taste in mouth
• headache
• sleeping problems
• vivid and unusual dreams
• mood or behavior changes
• agitation, hostility, depression
• suicidal thoughts

SOURCE: Chantix Recall › “very low nicotine” cigarettes may become sound alternative to Chantix

Chantix

“If Chantix has been studied and has been found to have likely caused 98 deaths and an additional 188 attempted suicides and it is allowed to remain on the market because smoking cessation is such an important goal, then what is the point of removing e-cigarettes from the market while studying its potential adverse effects?” Dr. Siegel asked in his blog.

“Suppose e-cigarettes were to be found to have caused 100 deaths. Would that warrant taking it off the market, since it — like Chantix — is helping people to quit smoking?” he asked further.

“… unlike Chantix – for which there were many immediate post-marketing reports of potential adverse effects, e-cigarettes have been on the market for more than 3 years and there have yet to be any severe adverse effects reported,” Dr. Siegel said.

“In other words, we know that people are dying from taking Chantix but we’re going to allow it to remain on the market because it’s helping people to quit smoking. We know that there is no evidence that anyone is dying from using electronic cigarettes, but we’re going to take them off the market, even though they are helping people to quit smoking. That just doesn’t make any sense,” Dr. Siegel said.

Dr. Siegel also blames the pharmaceutical industry’s massive power to influence opinion, whether it’s a position taken by a consumer group, an erroneous statement made by a nonprofit organization, or the public opinion in general.

He notes that some anti-smoking groups are calling on the FDA to withdraw e-cigarettes from the market despite a lack of evidence suggesting they are harmful, yet the same groups do not advocate for the removal of Chantix, even though the drug tops the FDA’s list of most dangerous drugs.

“So far, every anti-smoking group which has called for the removal of e-cigarettes from the market has been found to be financially tied to Big Pharma. The Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, and Action on Smoking and Health have all received funding of some sort from the pharmaceutical industry,” Dr. Siegel said.

SOURCE: Chantix Recall › FDA favors Chantix over e-cigarettes. Why?

Subsequent attempts to quit involved Zyban, nicotine gum, nicotine patches, nicotine lozenges, various herbal “de-tox” remedies, and Chantix. I even bought this little gadget that punched holes in my cigarettes, allowing most of the smoke to escape through the filter. As ingenious as that device seemed to me, it was as frustrating as trying to drink with a broken straw. After a minute of sucking air, I simply got another straw that wasn’t broken.

Eventually, the only method I had left to try was the primitive, old-fashioned cold turkey method. Had electronic cigarettes been around when I was trying to quit, I assure you, I would have bought them.

The idea of an alternative cigarette is so appealing that many smokers probably have conceived of a fake cigarette at some point in their lives. I remember sitting on a long, trans-Pacific flight, experiencing the first withdrawal pangs from all the cigarettes I chainsmoked in LAX hours before, when the idea of inventing a fake “traveling” cigarette came to mind – basically just a flameproof, smokeless dummy that smelled and tasted like a real cigarette … an adult pacifier of sorts. But that was just pure fantasy to me.

Electronic cigarettes are like those fantasy cigarettes, only better. They are battery powered cylinders with chemically loaded cartridges that deliver vaporous nicotine and other substances. In other words, they simulate real cigarettes like nothing else on the market.

Unfortunately, new studies reveal that these e-cigarettes are not without their own dangers. The Food and Drug Administration has not approved them for use and therefore does not regulate them. However, the FDA has conducted lab analyses and says that e-cigarettes contain toxic chemicals such as diethylene glycol (an ingredient used in antifreeze) and other toxic and carcinogenic substances.

In fact, the agency is asking the public to report any adverse events or product quality problems associated with the use of e-cigarettes to the FDA’s Medwatch Adverse Event Reporting Program.

Perhaps smoking substitutes are destined to be like so many of the substitutes for sugar, salt, and fat – marginally satisfying replacements that eventually prove to have negative side effects and health risks that are just as bad or worse than the real thing. The FDA’s e-cigarette advisory should remind smokers that, like Chantix, not all smoking cessation methods and replacement therapies are safe and risk-free.

SOURCE: Chantix Recall › Are e-cigarettes too good to be true?